Next Financial Crash: Buy Here Pay Here Used-Car Dealers

January 23, 2012

According to a report in the LA Times "Private equity firms are investing in chains of used-car lots, and auto loans are being packaged into securities much like subprime mortgages. Theyre attracted by the industrys average profit of 38% for each car sold…". Guest hosts Richard Eskow and Brian Unger discuss on The Young Turks. Learn more here: www.latimes.com www.latimes.com Subscribe to The Young Turks: bit.ly The Largest Online New Show in the World. Google+: www.gplus.to Facebook: www.facebook.com Twitter: twitter.com

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

More Videos & Fun Stuff:

'Financial terrorists behind EU crisis' Max Keiser on PressTV
Funny Videos - Funny prank - Reaction, Girl Getting Pranked With A Scratch Ticket
funny video game baby Commercial kung fu baby
Funny Video
 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

336 Responses to Next Financial Crash: Buy Here Pay Here Used-Car Dealers

  1. bordone on January 23, 2012 at 2:23 am

    I remember seeing these types of Dealerships outside Camp Pendelton. I know every base has to have this problem as well. I never fell for that crap but countless Marines did.

  2. bordone on January 23, 2012 at 2:23 am

    I remember seeing these types of Dealerships outside Camp Pendelton. I know every base has to have this problem as well. I never fell for that crap but countless Marines did.

  3. bordone on January 23, 2012 at 2:23 am

    I remember seeing these types of Dealerships outside Camp Pendelton. I know every base has to have this problem as well. I never fell for that crap but countless Marines did.

  4. bordone on January 23, 2012 at 2:23 am

    I remember seeing these types of Dealerships outside Camp Pendelton. I know every base has to have this problem as well. I never fell for that crap but countless Marines did.

  5. bordone on January 23, 2012 at 2:23 am

    I remember seeing these types of Dealerships outside Camp Pendelton. I know every base has to have this problem as well. I never fell for that crap but countless Marines did.

  6. bordone on January 23, 2012 at 2:23 am

    I remember seeing these types of Dealerships outside Camp Pendelton. I know every base has to have this problem as well. I never fell for that crap but countless Marines did.

  7. bordone on January 23, 2012 at 2:23 am

    I remember seeing these types of Dealerships outside Camp Pendelton. I know every base has to have this problem as well. I never fell for that crap but countless Marines did.

  8. bordone on January 23, 2012 at 2:23 am

    I remember seeing these types of Dealerships outside Camp Pendelton. I know every base has to have this problem as well. I never fell for that crap but countless Marines did.

  9. bordone on January 23, 2012 at 2:23 am

    I remember seeing these types of Dealerships outside Camp Pendelton. I know every base has to have this problem as well. I never fell for that crap but countless Marines did.

  10. bordone on January 23, 2012 at 2:23 am

    I remember seeing these types of Dealerships outside Camp Pendelton. I know every base has to have this problem as well. I never fell for that crap but countless Marines did.

  11. bordone on January 23, 2012 at 2:23 am

    I remember seeing these types of Dealerships outside Camp Pendelton. I know every base has to have this problem as well. I never fell for that crap but countless Marines did.

  12. bordone on January 23, 2012 at 2:23 am

    I remember seeing these types of Dealerships outside Camp Pendelton. I know every base has to have this problem as well. I never fell for that crap but countless Marines did.

  13. bordone on January 23, 2012 at 2:23 am

    I remember seeing these types of Dealerships outside Camp Pendelton. I know every base has to have this problem as well. I never fell for that crap but countless Marines did.

  14. bordone on January 23, 2012 at 2:23 am

    I remember seeing these types of Dealerships outside Camp Pendelton. I know every base has to have this problem as well. I never fell for that crap but countless Marines did.

  15. MachOverspeedsPlace on January 23, 2012 at 3:31 am

    @WhyMeMoFo But you can’t regulate stupidity…It’s an absolute pipe dream to think that one might design and institute a society with no risk, and without land-sharks of any kind.

    I learned how NOT to get ripped off, by getting ripped off. Charge it to the game.

  16. MachOverspeedsPlace on January 23, 2012 at 3:31 am

    @WhyMeMoFo But you can’t regulate stupidity…It’s an absolute pipe dream to think that one might design and institute a society with no risk, and without land-sharks of any kind.

    I learned how NOT to get ripped off, by getting ripped off. Charge it to the game.

  17. MachOverspeedsPlace on January 23, 2012 at 3:31 am

    @WhyMeMoFo But you can’t regulate stupidity…It’s an absolute pipe dream to think that one might design and institute a society with no risk, and without land-sharks of any kind.

    I learned how NOT to get ripped off, by getting ripped off. Charge it to the game.

  18. MachOverspeedsPlace on January 23, 2012 at 3:31 am

    @WhyMeMoFo But you can’t regulate stupidity…It’s an absolute pipe dream to think that one might design and institute a society with no risk, and without land-sharks of any kind.

    I learned how NOT to get ripped off, by getting ripped off. Charge it to the game.

  19. MachOverspeedsPlace on January 23, 2012 at 3:31 am

    @WhyMeMoFo But you can’t regulate stupidity…It’s an absolute pipe dream to think that one might design and institute a society with no risk, and without land-sharks of any kind.

    I learned how NOT to get ripped off, by getting ripped off. Charge it to the game.

  20. MachOverspeedsPlace on January 23, 2012 at 3:31 am

    @WhyMeMoFo But you can’t regulate stupidity…It’s an absolute pipe dream to think that one might design and institute a society with no risk, and without land-sharks of any kind.

    I learned how NOT to get ripped off, by getting ripped off. Charge it to the game.

  21. MachOverspeedsPlace on January 23, 2012 at 3:31 am

    @WhyMeMoFo But you can’t regulate stupidity…It’s an absolute pipe dream to think that one might design and institute a society with no risk, and without land-sharks of any kind.

    I learned how NOT to get ripped off, by getting ripped off. Charge it to the game.

  22. MachOverspeedsPlace on January 23, 2012 at 3:31 am

    @WhyMeMoFo But you can’t regulate stupidity…It’s an absolute pipe dream to think that one might design and institute a society with no risk, and without land-sharks of any kind.

    I learned how NOT to get ripped off, by getting ripped off. Charge it to the game.

  23. MachOverspeedsPlace on January 23, 2012 at 3:31 am

    @WhyMeMoFo But you can’t regulate stupidity…It’s an absolute pipe dream to think that one might design and institute a society with no risk, and without land-sharks of any kind.

    I learned how NOT to get ripped off, by getting ripped off. Charge it to the game.

  24. MachOverspeedsPlace on January 23, 2012 at 3:31 am

    @WhyMeMoFo But you can’t regulate stupidity…It’s an absolute pipe dream to think that one might design and institute a society with no risk, and without land-sharks of any kind.

    I learned how NOT to get ripped off, by getting ripped off. Charge it to the game.

  25. MachOverspeedsPlace on January 23, 2012 at 3:31 am

    @WhyMeMoFo But you can’t regulate stupidity…It’s an absolute pipe dream to think that one might design and institute a society with no risk, and without land-sharks of any kind.

    I learned how NOT to get ripped off, by getting ripped off. Charge it to the game.

  26. MachOverspeedsPlace on January 23, 2012 at 3:31 am

    @WhyMeMoFo But you can’t regulate stupidity…It’s an absolute pipe dream to think that one might design and institute a society with no risk, and without land-sharks of any kind.

    I learned how NOT to get ripped off, by getting ripped off. Charge it to the game.

  27. MachOverspeedsPlace on January 23, 2012 at 3:31 am

    @WhyMeMoFo But you can’t regulate stupidity…It’s an absolute pipe dream to think that one might design and institute a society with no risk, and without land-sharks of any kind.

    I learned how NOT to get ripped off, by getting ripped off. Charge it to the game.

  28. MachOverspeedsPlace on January 23, 2012 at 3:31 am

    @WhyMeMoFo But you can’t regulate stupidity…It’s an absolute pipe dream to think that one might design and institute a society with no risk, and without land-sharks of any kind.

    I learned how NOT to get ripped off, by getting ripped off. Charge it to the game.

  29. highnine9 on January 23, 2012 at 4:39 am

    its called serfdom

  30. highnine9 on January 23, 2012 at 4:39 am

    its called serfdom

  31. highnine9 on January 23, 2012 at 4:39 am

    its called serfdom

  32. highnine9 on January 23, 2012 at 4:39 am

    its called serfdom

  33. highnine9 on January 23, 2012 at 4:39 am

    its called serfdom

  34. highnine9 on January 23, 2012 at 4:39 am

    its called serfdom

  35. highnine9 on January 23, 2012 at 4:39 am

    its called serfdom

  36. highnine9 on January 23, 2012 at 4:39 am

    its called serfdom

  37. highnine9 on January 23, 2012 at 4:39 am

    its called serfdom

  38. highnine9 on January 23, 2012 at 4:39 am

    its called serfdom

  39. highnine9 on January 23, 2012 at 4:39 am

    its called serfdom

  40. highnine9 on January 23, 2012 at 4:39 am

    its called serfdom

  41. highnine9 on January 23, 2012 at 4:39 am

    its called serfdom

  42. highnine9 on January 23, 2012 at 4:39 am

    its called serfdom

  43. romanmir01 on January 23, 2012 at 5:47 am

    @WhyMeMoFo 2008 has proven that US government will keep bailing out failures and will finish off US economy in a totalitarian hyper-inflation.

  44. romanmir01 on January 23, 2012 at 5:47 am

    @WhyMeMoFo 2008 has proven that US government will keep bailing out failures and will finish off US economy in a totalitarian hyper-inflation.

  45. romanmir01 on January 23, 2012 at 5:47 am

    @WhyMeMoFo 2008 has proven that US government will keep bailing out failures and will finish off US economy in a totalitarian hyper-inflation.

  46. romanmir01 on January 23, 2012 at 5:47 am

    @WhyMeMoFo 2008 has proven that US government will keep bailing out failures and will finish off US economy in a totalitarian hyper-inflation.

  47. romanmir01 on January 23, 2012 at 5:47 am

    @WhyMeMoFo 2008 has proven that US government will keep bailing out failures and will finish off US economy in a totalitarian hyper-inflation.

  48. romanmir01 on January 23, 2012 at 5:47 am

    @WhyMeMoFo 2008 has proven that US government will keep bailing out failures and will finish off US economy in a totalitarian hyper-inflation.

  49. romanmir01 on January 23, 2012 at 5:47 am

    @WhyMeMoFo 2008 has proven that US government will keep bailing out failures and will finish off US economy in a totalitarian hyper-inflation.

  50. romanmir01 on January 23, 2012 at 5:47 am

    @WhyMeMoFo 2008 has proven that US government will keep bailing out failures and will finish off US economy in a totalitarian hyper-inflation.

  51. romanmir01 on January 23, 2012 at 5:47 am

    @WhyMeMoFo 2008 has proven that US government will keep bailing out failures and will finish off US economy in a totalitarian hyper-inflation.

  52. romanmir01 on January 23, 2012 at 5:47 am

    @WhyMeMoFo 2008 has proven that US government will keep bailing out failures and will finish off US economy in a totalitarian hyper-inflation.

  53. romanmir01 on January 23, 2012 at 5:47 am

    @WhyMeMoFo 2008 has proven that US government will keep bailing out failures and will finish off US economy in a totalitarian hyper-inflation.

  54. romanmir01 on January 23, 2012 at 5:47 am

    @WhyMeMoFo 2008 has proven that US government will keep bailing out failures and will finish off US economy in a totalitarian hyper-inflation.

  55. romanmir01 on January 23, 2012 at 5:47 am

    @WhyMeMoFo 2008 has proven that US government will keep bailing out failures and will finish off US economy in a totalitarian hyper-inflation.

  56. romanmir01 on January 23, 2012 at 5:47 am

    @WhyMeMoFo 2008 has proven that US government will keep bailing out failures and will finish off US economy in a totalitarian hyper-inflation.

  57. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 6:55 am

    @MachOverspeedsPlace A wonderful argument for more and more regulations!

  58. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 6:55 am

    @MachOverspeedsPlace A wonderful argument for more and more regulations!

  59. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 6:55 am

    @MachOverspeedsPlace A wonderful argument for more and more regulations!

  60. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 6:55 am

    @MachOverspeedsPlace A wonderful argument for more and more regulations!

  61. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 6:55 am

    @MachOverspeedsPlace A wonderful argument for more and more regulations!

  62. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 6:55 am

    @MachOverspeedsPlace A wonderful argument for more and more regulations!

  63. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 6:55 am

    @MachOverspeedsPlace A wonderful argument for more and more regulations!

  64. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 6:55 am

    @MachOverspeedsPlace A wonderful argument for more and more regulations!

  65. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 6:55 am

    @MachOverspeedsPlace A wonderful argument for more and more regulations!

  66. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 6:55 am

    @MachOverspeedsPlace A wonderful argument for more and more regulations!

  67. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 6:55 am

    @MachOverspeedsPlace A wonderful argument for more and more regulations!

  68. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 6:55 am

    @MachOverspeedsPlace A wonderful argument for more and more regulations!

  69. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 6:55 am

    @MachOverspeedsPlace A wonderful argument for more and more regulations!

  70. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 6:55 am

    @MachOverspeedsPlace A wonderful argument for more and more regulations!

  71. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 8:03 am

    @romanmir01 If 2008 has proven ANYTHING beyond a doubt, it is this. ALL debt is 100% negotiable. I will never forget this lesson.

  72. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 8:03 am

    @romanmir01 If 2008 has proven ANYTHING beyond a doubt, it is this. ALL debt is 100% negotiable. I will never forget this lesson.

  73. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 8:03 am

    @romanmir01 If 2008 has proven ANYTHING beyond a doubt, it is this. ALL debt is 100% negotiable. I will never forget this lesson.

  74. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 8:03 am

    @romanmir01 If 2008 has proven ANYTHING beyond a doubt, it is this. ALL debt is 100% negotiable. I will never forget this lesson.

  75. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 8:03 am

    @romanmir01 If 2008 has proven ANYTHING beyond a doubt, it is this. ALL debt is 100% negotiable. I will never forget this lesson.

  76. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 8:03 am

    @romanmir01 If 2008 has proven ANYTHING beyond a doubt, it is this. ALL debt is 100% negotiable. I will never forget this lesson.

  77. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 8:03 am

    @romanmir01 If 2008 has proven ANYTHING beyond a doubt, it is this. ALL debt is 100% negotiable. I will never forget this lesson.

  78. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 8:03 am

    @romanmir01 If 2008 has proven ANYTHING beyond a doubt, it is this. ALL debt is 100% negotiable. I will never forget this lesson.

  79. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 8:03 am

    @romanmir01 If 2008 has proven ANYTHING beyond a doubt, it is this. ALL debt is 100% negotiable. I will never forget this lesson.

  80. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 8:03 am

    @romanmir01 If 2008 has proven ANYTHING beyond a doubt, it is this. ALL debt is 100% negotiable. I will never forget this lesson.

  81. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 8:03 am

    @romanmir01 If 2008 has proven ANYTHING beyond a doubt, it is this. ALL debt is 100% negotiable. I will never forget this lesson.

  82. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 8:03 am

    @romanmir01 If 2008 has proven ANYTHING beyond a doubt, it is this. ALL debt is 100% negotiable. I will never forget this lesson.

  83. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 8:03 am

    @romanmir01 If 2008 has proven ANYTHING beyond a doubt, it is this. ALL debt is 100% negotiable. I will never forget this lesson.

  84. WhyMeMoFo on January 23, 2012 at 8:03 am

    @romanmir01 If 2008 has proven ANYTHING beyond a doubt, it is this. ALL debt is 100% negotiable. I will never forget this lesson.

  85. Sevryn9001 on January 23, 2012 at 9:11 am

    Deplorable!

  86. Sevryn9001 on January 23, 2012 at 9:11 am

    Deplorable!

  87. Sevryn9001 on January 23, 2012 at 9:11 am

    Deplorable!

  88. Sevryn9001 on January 23, 2012 at 9:11 am

    Deplorable!

  89. Sevryn9001 on January 23, 2012 at 9:11 am

    Deplorable!

  90. Sevryn9001 on January 23, 2012 at 9:11 am

    Deplorable!

  91. Sevryn9001 on January 23, 2012 at 9:11 am

    Deplorable!

  92. Sevryn9001 on January 23, 2012 at 9:11 am

    Deplorable!

  93. Sevryn9001 on January 23, 2012 at 9:11 am

    Deplorable!

  94. Sevryn9001 on January 23, 2012 at 9:11 am

    Deplorable!

  95. Sevryn9001 on January 23, 2012 at 9:11 am

    Deplorable!

  96. Sevryn9001 on January 23, 2012 at 9:11 am

    Deplorable!

  97. Sevryn9001 on January 23, 2012 at 9:11 am

    Deplorable!

  98. Sevryn9001 on January 23, 2012 at 9:11 am

    Deplorable!

  99. jeffthornton on January 23, 2012 at 10:19 am

    @JohnnyTyrone77 I’d advise against the Mazda. It’s just a Japanese Ford.

  100. jeffthornton on January 23, 2012 at 10:19 am

    @JohnnyTyrone77 I’d advise against the Mazda. It’s just a Japanese Ford.

  101. jeffthornton on January 23, 2012 at 10:19 am

    @JohnnyTyrone77 I’d advise against the Mazda. It’s just a Japanese Ford.

  102. jeffthornton on January 23, 2012 at 10:19 am

    @JohnnyTyrone77 I’d advise against the Mazda. It’s just a Japanese Ford.

  103. jeffthornton on January 23, 2012 at 10:19 am

    @JohnnyTyrone77 I’d advise against the Mazda. It’s just a Japanese Ford.

  104. jeffthornton on January 23, 2012 at 10:19 am

    @JohnnyTyrone77 I’d advise against the Mazda. It’s just a Japanese Ford.

  105. jeffthornton on January 23, 2012 at 10:19 am

    @JohnnyTyrone77 I’d advise against the Mazda. It’s just a Japanese Ford.

  106. jeffthornton on January 23, 2012 at 10:19 am

    @JohnnyTyrone77 I’d advise against the Mazda. It’s just a Japanese Ford.

  107. jeffthornton on January 23, 2012 at 10:19 am

    @JohnnyTyrone77 I’d advise against the Mazda. It’s just a Japanese Ford.

  108. jeffthornton on January 23, 2012 at 10:19 am

    @JohnnyTyrone77 I’d advise against the Mazda. It’s just a Japanese Ford.

  109. jeffthornton on January 23, 2012 at 10:19 am

    @JohnnyTyrone77 I’d advise against the Mazda. It’s just a Japanese Ford.

  110. jeffthornton on January 23, 2012 at 10:19 am

    @JohnnyTyrone77 I’d advise against the Mazda. It’s just a Japanese Ford.

  111. jeffthornton on January 23, 2012 at 10:19 am

    @JohnnyTyrone77 I’d advise against the Mazda. It’s just a Japanese Ford.

  112. jeffthornton on January 23, 2012 at 10:19 am

    @JohnnyTyrone77 I’d advise against the Mazda. It’s just a Japanese Ford.

  113. MyTemporaryAccount88 on January 23, 2012 at 11:27 am

    American jobcreators at work ^^

  114. MyTemporaryAccount88 on January 23, 2012 at 11:27 am

    American jobcreators at work ^^

  115. MyTemporaryAccount88 on January 23, 2012 at 11:27 am

    American jobcreators at work ^^

  116. MyTemporaryAccount88 on January 23, 2012 at 11:27 am

    American jobcreators at work ^^

  117. MyTemporaryAccount88 on January 23, 2012 at 11:27 am

    American jobcreators at work ^^

  118. MyTemporaryAccount88 on January 23, 2012 at 11:27 am

    American jobcreators at work ^^

  119. MyTemporaryAccount88 on January 23, 2012 at 11:27 am

    American jobcreators at work ^^

  120. MyTemporaryAccount88 on January 23, 2012 at 11:27 am

    American jobcreators at work ^^

  121. MyTemporaryAccount88 on January 23, 2012 at 11:27 am

    American jobcreators at work ^^

  122. MyTemporaryAccount88 on January 23, 2012 at 11:27 am

    American jobcreators at work ^^

  123. MyTemporaryAccount88 on January 23, 2012 at 11:27 am

    American jobcreators at work ^^

  124. MyTemporaryAccount88 on January 23, 2012 at 11:27 am

    American jobcreators at work ^^

  125. MyTemporaryAccount88 on January 23, 2012 at 11:27 am

    American jobcreators at work ^^

  126. MyTemporaryAccount88 on January 23, 2012 at 11:27 am

    American jobcreators at work ^^

  127. 76malibu81 on January 23, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    These guys are outraged at a company that would take its property back after its not being paid for?

  128. 76malibu81 on January 23, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    These guys are outraged at a company that would take its property back after its not being paid for?

  129. 76malibu81 on January 23, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    These guys are outraged at a company that would take its property back after its not being paid for?

  130. 76malibu81 on January 23, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    These guys are outraged at a company that would take its property back after its not being paid for?

  131. 76malibu81 on January 23, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    These guys are outraged at a company that would take its property back after its not being paid for?

  132. 76malibu81 on January 23, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    These guys are outraged at a company that would take its property back after its not being paid for?

  133. 76malibu81 on January 23, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    These guys are outraged at a company that would take its property back after its not being paid for?

  134. 76malibu81 on January 23, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    These guys are outraged at a company that would take its property back after its not being paid for?

  135. 76malibu81 on January 23, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    These guys are outraged at a company that would take its property back after its not being paid for?

  136. 76malibu81 on January 23, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    These guys are outraged at a company that would take its property back after its not being paid for?

  137. 76malibu81 on January 23, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    These guys are outraged at a company that would take its property back after its not being paid for?

  138. 76malibu81 on January 23, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    These guys are outraged at a company that would take its property back after its not being paid for?

  139. 76malibu81 on January 23, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    These guys are outraged at a company that would take its property back after its not being paid for?

  140. 76malibu81 on January 23, 2012 at 12:35 pm

    These guys are outraged at a company that would take its property back after its not being paid for?

  141. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    @DackIsBack Opinions aren’t arguments.

  142. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    @DackIsBack Opinions aren’t arguments.

  143. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    @DackIsBack Opinions aren’t arguments.

  144. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    @DackIsBack Opinions aren’t arguments.

  145. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    @DackIsBack Opinions aren’t arguments.

  146. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    @DackIsBack Opinions aren’t arguments.

  147. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    @DackIsBack Opinions aren’t arguments.

  148. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    @DackIsBack Opinions aren’t arguments.

  149. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    @DackIsBack Opinions aren’t arguments.

  150. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    @DackIsBack Opinions aren’t arguments.

  151. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    @DackIsBack Opinions aren’t arguments.

  152. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    @DackIsBack Opinions aren’t arguments.

  153. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    @DackIsBack Opinions aren’t arguments.

  154. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 1:43 pm

    @DackIsBack Opinions aren’t arguments.

  155. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 2:51 pm

    To make this work for you 1) Put down as much as you can-it lowers your monthly note. 2)Take someone with you that knows cars. 3)Pick a Toyota,Nissan,Honda,(Mazda? maybe) with no more than 110,000 miles on it-these usually last 200,000-300,000 miles. 4) I advise against buying anything too new (500-800 a month?! get real!) 5) Get a 2000-2006 model,make your payments on time,stay in contact with the dealer if you get in a jam,Keep up the maintenance!!!

  156. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 2:51 pm

    To make this work for you 1) Put down as much as you can-it lowers your monthly note. 2)Take someone with you that knows cars. 3)Pick a Toyota,Nissan,Honda,(Mazda? maybe) with no more than 110,000 miles on it-these usually last 200,000-300,000 miles. 4) I advise against buying anything too new (500-800 a month?! get real!) 5) Get a 2000-2006 model,make your payments on time,stay in contact with the dealer if you get in a jam,Keep up the maintenance!!!

  157. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 2:51 pm

    To make this work for you 1) Put down as much as you can-it lowers your monthly note. 2)Take someone with you that knows cars. 3)Pick a Toyota,Nissan,Honda,(Mazda? maybe) with no more than 110,000 miles on it-these usually last 200,000-300,000 miles. 4) I advise against buying anything too new (500-800 a month?! get real!) 5) Get a 2000-2006 model,make your payments on time,stay in contact with the dealer if you get in a jam,Keep up the maintenance!!!

  158. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 2:51 pm

    To make this work for you 1) Put down as much as you can-it lowers your monthly note. 2)Take someone with you that knows cars. 3)Pick a Toyota,Nissan,Honda,(Mazda? maybe) with no more than 110,000 miles on it-these usually last 200,000-300,000 miles. 4) I advise against buying anything too new (500-800 a month?! get real!) 5) Get a 2000-2006 model,make your payments on time,stay in contact with the dealer if you get in a jam,Keep up the maintenance!!!

  159. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 2:51 pm

    To make this work for you 1) Put down as much as you can-it lowers your monthly note. 2)Take someone with you that knows cars. 3)Pick a Toyota,Nissan,Honda,(Mazda? maybe) with no more than 110,000 miles on it-these usually last 200,000-300,000 miles. 4) I advise against buying anything too new (500-800 a month?! get real!) 5) Get a 2000-2006 model,make your payments on time,stay in contact with the dealer if you get in a jam,Keep up the maintenance!!!

  160. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 2:51 pm

    To make this work for you 1) Put down as much as you can-it lowers your monthly note. 2)Take someone with you that knows cars. 3)Pick a Toyota,Nissan,Honda,(Mazda? maybe) with no more than 110,000 miles on it-these usually last 200,000-300,000 miles. 4) I advise against buying anything too new (500-800 a month?! get real!) 5) Get a 2000-2006 model,make your payments on time,stay in contact with the dealer if you get in a jam,Keep up the maintenance!!!

  161. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 2:51 pm

    To make this work for you 1) Put down as much as you can-it lowers your monthly note. 2)Take someone with you that knows cars. 3)Pick a Toyota,Nissan,Honda,(Mazda? maybe) with no more than 110,000 miles on it-these usually last 200,000-300,000 miles. 4) I advise against buying anything too new (500-800 a month?! get real!) 5) Get a 2000-2006 model,make your payments on time,stay in contact with the dealer if you get in a jam,Keep up the maintenance!!!

  162. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 2:51 pm

    To make this work for you 1) Put down as much as you can-it lowers your monthly note. 2)Take someone with you that knows cars. 3)Pick a Toyota,Nissan,Honda,(Mazda? maybe) with no more than 110,000 miles on it-these usually last 200,000-300,000 miles. 4) I advise against buying anything too new (500-800 a month?! get real!) 5) Get a 2000-2006 model,make your payments on time,stay in contact with the dealer if you get in a jam,Keep up the maintenance!!!

  163. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 2:51 pm

    To make this work for you 1) Put down as much as you can-it lowers your monthly note. 2)Take someone with you that knows cars. 3)Pick a Toyota,Nissan,Honda,(Mazda? maybe) with no more than 110,000 miles on it-these usually last 200,000-300,000 miles. 4) I advise against buying anything too new (500-800 a month?! get real!) 5) Get a 2000-2006 model,make your payments on time,stay in contact with the dealer if you get in a jam,Keep up the maintenance!!!

  164. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 2:51 pm

    To make this work for you 1) Put down as much as you can-it lowers your monthly note. 2)Take someone with you that knows cars. 3)Pick a Toyota,Nissan,Honda,(Mazda? maybe) with no more than 110,000 miles on it-these usually last 200,000-300,000 miles. 4) I advise against buying anything too new (500-800 a month?! get real!) 5) Get a 2000-2006 model,make your payments on time,stay in contact with the dealer if you get in a jam,Keep up the maintenance!!!

  165. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 2:51 pm

    To make this work for you 1) Put down as much as you can-it lowers your monthly note. 2)Take someone with you that knows cars. 3)Pick a Toyota,Nissan,Honda,(Mazda? maybe) with no more than 110,000 miles on it-these usually last 200,000-300,000 miles. 4) I advise against buying anything too new (500-800 a month?! get real!) 5) Get a 2000-2006 model,make your payments on time,stay in contact with the dealer if you get in a jam,Keep up the maintenance!!!

  166. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 2:51 pm

    To make this work for you 1) Put down as much as you can-it lowers your monthly note. 2)Take someone with you that knows cars. 3)Pick a Toyota,Nissan,Honda,(Mazda? maybe) with no more than 110,000 miles on it-these usually last 200,000-300,000 miles. 4) I advise against buying anything too new (500-800 a month?! get real!) 5) Get a 2000-2006 model,make your payments on time,stay in contact with the dealer if you get in a jam,Keep up the maintenance!!!

  167. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 2:51 pm

    To make this work for you 1) Put down as much as you can-it lowers your monthly note. 2)Take someone with you that knows cars. 3)Pick a Toyota,Nissan,Honda,(Mazda? maybe) with no more than 110,000 miles on it-these usually last 200,000-300,000 miles. 4) I advise against buying anything too new (500-800 a month?! get real!) 5) Get a 2000-2006 model,make your payments on time,stay in contact with the dealer if you get in a jam,Keep up the maintenance!!!

  168. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 2:51 pm

    To make this work for you 1) Put down as much as you can-it lowers your monthly note. 2)Take someone with you that knows cars. 3)Pick a Toyota,Nissan,Honda,(Mazda? maybe) with no more than 110,000 miles on it-these usually last 200,000-300,000 miles. 4) I advise against buying anything too new (500-800 a month?! get real!) 5) Get a 2000-2006 model,make your payments on time,stay in contact with the dealer if you get in a jam,Keep up the maintenance!!!

  169. DackIsBack on January 23, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo Hurrr…

    The state shouldn’t be involved in marriage, A State Sanctioned Marriage Licence is very different from a private contract.

  170. DackIsBack on January 23, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo Hurrr…

    The state shouldn’t be involved in marriage, A State Sanctioned Marriage Licence is very different from a private contract.

  171. DackIsBack on January 23, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo Hurrr…

    The state shouldn’t be involved in marriage, A State Sanctioned Marriage Licence is very different from a private contract.

  172. DackIsBack on January 23, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo Hurrr…

    The state shouldn’t be involved in marriage, A State Sanctioned Marriage Licence is very different from a private contract.

  173. DackIsBack on January 23, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo Hurrr…

    The state shouldn’t be involved in marriage, A State Sanctioned Marriage Licence is very different from a private contract.

  174. DackIsBack on January 23, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo Hurrr…

    The state shouldn’t be involved in marriage, A State Sanctioned Marriage Licence is very different from a private contract.

  175. DackIsBack on January 23, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo Hurrr…

    The state shouldn’t be involved in marriage, A State Sanctioned Marriage Licence is very different from a private contract.

  176. DackIsBack on January 23, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo Hurrr…

    The state shouldn’t be involved in marriage, A State Sanctioned Marriage Licence is very different from a private contract.

  177. DackIsBack on January 23, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo Hurrr…

    The state shouldn’t be involved in marriage, A State Sanctioned Marriage Licence is very different from a private contract.

  178. DackIsBack on January 23, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo Hurrr…

    The state shouldn’t be involved in marriage, A State Sanctioned Marriage Licence is very different from a private contract.

  179. DackIsBack on January 23, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo Hurrr…

    The state shouldn’t be involved in marriage, A State Sanctioned Marriage Licence is very different from a private contract.

  180. DackIsBack on January 23, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo Hurrr…

    The state shouldn’t be involved in marriage, A State Sanctioned Marriage Licence is very different from a private contract.

  181. DackIsBack on January 23, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo Hurrr…

    The state shouldn’t be involved in marriage, A State Sanctioned Marriage Licence is very different from a private contract.

  182. DackIsBack on January 23, 2012 at 3:59 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo Hurrr…

    The state shouldn’t be involved in marriage, A State Sanctioned Marriage Licence is very different from a private contract.

  183. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 5:07 pm

    I got myself into a bad credit situation and the only dealers that would work with me in Southern California were the buy here-pay here car dealers. Had to pay a high interest rate but that is the situation i was in.As long as i made my payments,(300.00 a month), all was well.Purchased at least 3 cars like this.The last car i payed off i got the pink slip and a letter from the dealer stating i made all payments on time for 28 months.Sent that letter to my credit file to help boost my rating.

  184. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 5:07 pm

    I got myself into a bad credit situation and the only dealers that would work with me in Southern California were the buy here-pay here car dealers. Had to pay a high interest rate but that is the situation i was in.As long as i made my payments,(300.00 a month), all was well.Purchased at least 3 cars like this.The last car i payed off i got the pink slip and a letter from the dealer stating i made all payments on time for 28 months.Sent that letter to my credit file to help boost my rating.

  185. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 5:07 pm

    I got myself into a bad credit situation and the only dealers that would work with me in Southern California were the buy here-pay here car dealers. Had to pay a high interest rate but that is the situation i was in.As long as i made my payments,(300.00 a month), all was well.Purchased at least 3 cars like this.The last car i payed off i got the pink slip and a letter from the dealer stating i made all payments on time for 28 months.Sent that letter to my credit file to help boost my rating.

  186. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 5:07 pm

    I got myself into a bad credit situation and the only dealers that would work with me in Southern California were the buy here-pay here car dealers. Had to pay a high interest rate but that is the situation i was in.As long as i made my payments,(300.00 a month), all was well.Purchased at least 3 cars like this.The last car i payed off i got the pink slip and a letter from the dealer stating i made all payments on time for 28 months.Sent that letter to my credit file to help boost my rating.

  187. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 5:07 pm

    I got myself into a bad credit situation and the only dealers that would work with me in Southern California were the buy here-pay here car dealers. Had to pay a high interest rate but that is the situation i was in.As long as i made my payments,(300.00 a month), all was well.Purchased at least 3 cars like this.The last car i payed off i got the pink slip and a letter from the dealer stating i made all payments on time for 28 months.Sent that letter to my credit file to help boost my rating.

  188. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 5:07 pm

    I got myself into a bad credit situation and the only dealers that would work with me in Southern California were the buy here-pay here car dealers. Had to pay a high interest rate but that is the situation i was in.As long as i made my payments,(300.00 a month), all was well.Purchased at least 3 cars like this.The last car i payed off i got the pink slip and a letter from the dealer stating i made all payments on time for 28 months.Sent that letter to my credit file to help boost my rating.

  189. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 5:07 pm

    I got myself into a bad credit situation and the only dealers that would work with me in Southern California were the buy here-pay here car dealers. Had to pay a high interest rate but that is the situation i was in.As long as i made my payments,(300.00 a month), all was well.Purchased at least 3 cars like this.The last car i payed off i got the pink slip and a letter from the dealer stating i made all payments on time for 28 months.Sent that letter to my credit file to help boost my rating.

  190. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 5:07 pm

    I got myself into a bad credit situation and the only dealers that would work with me in Southern California were the buy here-pay here car dealers. Had to pay a high interest rate but that is the situation i was in.As long as i made my payments,(300.00 a month), all was well.Purchased at least 3 cars like this.The last car i payed off i got the pink slip and a letter from the dealer stating i made all payments on time for 28 months.Sent that letter to my credit file to help boost my rating.

  191. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 5:07 pm

    I got myself into a bad credit situation and the only dealers that would work with me in Southern California were the buy here-pay here car dealers. Had to pay a high interest rate but that is the situation i was in.As long as i made my payments,(300.00 a month), all was well.Purchased at least 3 cars like this.The last car i payed off i got the pink slip and a letter from the dealer stating i made all payments on time for 28 months.Sent that letter to my credit file to help boost my rating.

  192. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 5:07 pm

    I got myself into a bad credit situation and the only dealers that would work with me in Southern California were the buy here-pay here car dealers. Had to pay a high interest rate but that is the situation i was in.As long as i made my payments,(300.00 a month), all was well.Purchased at least 3 cars like this.The last car i payed off i got the pink slip and a letter from the dealer stating i made all payments on time for 28 months.Sent that letter to my credit file to help boost my rating.

  193. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 5:07 pm

    I got myself into a bad credit situation and the only dealers that would work with me in Southern California were the buy here-pay here car dealers. Had to pay a high interest rate but that is the situation i was in.As long as i made my payments,(300.00 a month), all was well.Purchased at least 3 cars like this.The last car i payed off i got the pink slip and a letter from the dealer stating i made all payments on time for 28 months.Sent that letter to my credit file to help boost my rating.

  194. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 5:07 pm

    I got myself into a bad credit situation and the only dealers that would work with me in Southern California were the buy here-pay here car dealers. Had to pay a high interest rate but that is the situation i was in.As long as i made my payments,(300.00 a month), all was well.Purchased at least 3 cars like this.The last car i payed off i got the pink slip and a letter from the dealer stating i made all payments on time for 28 months.Sent that letter to my credit file to help boost my rating.

  195. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 5:07 pm

    I got myself into a bad credit situation and the only dealers that would work with me in Southern California were the buy here-pay here car dealers. Had to pay a high interest rate but that is the situation i was in.As long as i made my payments,(300.00 a month), all was well.Purchased at least 3 cars like this.The last car i payed off i got the pink slip and a letter from the dealer stating i made all payments on time for 28 months.Sent that letter to my credit file to help boost my rating.

  196. JohnnyTyrone77 on January 23, 2012 at 5:07 pm

    I got myself into a bad credit situation and the only dealers that would work with me in Southern California were the buy here-pay here car dealers. Had to pay a high interest rate but that is the situation i was in.As long as i made my payments,(300.00 a month), all was well.Purchased at least 3 cars like this.The last car i payed off i got the pink slip and a letter from the dealer stating i made all payments on time for 28 months.Sent that letter to my credit file to help boost my rating.

  197. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 6:15 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not like these buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  198. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 6:15 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not like these buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  199. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 6:15 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not like these buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  200. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 6:15 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not like these buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  201. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 6:15 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not like these buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  202. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 6:15 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not like these buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  203. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 6:15 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not like these buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  204. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 6:15 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not like these buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  205. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 6:15 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not like these buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  206. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 6:15 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not like these buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  207. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 6:15 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not like these buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  208. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 6:15 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not like these buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  209. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 6:15 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not like these buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  210. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 6:15 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not like these buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  211. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not lime there buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  212. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not lime there buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  213. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not lime there buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  214. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not lime there buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  215. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not lime there buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  216. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not lime there buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  217. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not lime there buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  218. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not lime there buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  219. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not lime there buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  220. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not lime there buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  221. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not lime there buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  222. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not lime there buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  223. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not lime there buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  224. businka1 on January 23, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    Nooooooo!
    These dealers came up with ideas that sell. This is what the American Dream means.
    It’s not lime there buyers were forced to take the mortages.

    (Sarcarsm)

  225. Bankstercide on January 23, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    I remember the scandal that erupted when people found out that cheque cashing centers were concentrated around military bases in the US.

    The reason is not so much that the servicemen and their families are poor (they are), but that servicemen’s debts are technically underwritten by the US Armed Forces.

    For example, if I get a Marine stuck in a scam where he is heavily in debt, I can depend on the USMC making sure that the Marine pays it out one way or another.

  226. Bankstercide on January 23, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    I remember the scandal that erupted when people found out that cheque cashing centers were concentrated around military bases in the US.

    The reason is not so much that the servicemen and their families are poor (they are), but that servicemen’s debts are technically underwritten by the US Armed Forces.

    For example, if I get a Marine stuck in a scam where he is heavily in debt, I can depend on the USMC making sure that the Marine pays it out one way or another.

  227. Bankstercide on January 23, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    I remember the scandal that erupted when people found out that cheque cashing centers were concentrated around military bases in the US.

    The reason is not so much that the servicemen and their families are poor (they are), but that servicemen’s debts are technically underwritten by the US Armed Forces.

    For example, if I get a Marine stuck in a scam where he is heavily in debt, I can depend on the USMC making sure that the Marine pays it out one way or another.

  228. Bankstercide on January 23, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    I remember the scandal that erupted when people found out that cheque cashing centers were concentrated around military bases in the US.

    The reason is not so much that the servicemen and their families are poor (they are), but that servicemen’s debts are technically underwritten by the US Armed Forces.

    For example, if I get a Marine stuck in a scam where he is heavily in debt, I can depend on the USMC making sure that the Marine pays it out one way or another.

  229. Bankstercide on January 23, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    I remember the scandal that erupted when people found out that cheque cashing centers were concentrated around military bases in the US.

    The reason is not so much that the servicemen and their families are poor (they are), but that servicemen’s debts are technically underwritten by the US Armed Forces.

    For example, if I get a Marine stuck in a scam where he is heavily in debt, I can depend on the USMC making sure that the Marine pays it out one way or another.

  230. Bankstercide on January 23, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    I remember the scandal that erupted when people found out that cheque cashing centers were concentrated around military bases in the US.

    The reason is not so much that the servicemen and their families are poor (they are), but that servicemen’s debts are technically underwritten by the US Armed Forces.

    For example, if I get a Marine stuck in a scam where he is heavily in debt, I can depend on the USMC making sure that the Marine pays it out one way or another.

  231. Bankstercide on January 23, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    I remember the scandal that erupted when people found out that cheque cashing centers were concentrated around military bases in the US.

    The reason is not so much that the servicemen and their families are poor (they are), but that servicemen’s debts are technically underwritten by the US Armed Forces.

    For example, if I get a Marine stuck in a scam where he is heavily in debt, I can depend on the USMC making sure that the Marine pays it out one way or another.

  232. Bankstercide on January 23, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    I remember the scandal that erupted when people found out that cheque cashing centers were concentrated around military bases in the US.

    The reason is not so much that the servicemen and their families are poor (they are), but that servicemen’s debts are technically underwritten by the US Armed Forces.

    For example, if I get a Marine stuck in a scam where he is heavily in debt, I can depend on the USMC making sure that the Marine pays it out one way or another.

  233. Bankstercide on January 23, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    I remember the scandal that erupted when people found out that cheque cashing centers were concentrated around military bases in the US.

    The reason is not so much that the servicemen and their families are poor (they are), but that servicemen’s debts are technically underwritten by the US Armed Forces.

    For example, if I get a Marine stuck in a scam where he is heavily in debt, I can depend on the USMC making sure that the Marine pays it out one way or another.

  234. Bankstercide on January 23, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    I remember the scandal that erupted when people found out that cheque cashing centers were concentrated around military bases in the US.

    The reason is not so much that the servicemen and their families are poor (they are), but that servicemen’s debts are technically underwritten by the US Armed Forces.

    For example, if I get a Marine stuck in a scam where he is heavily in debt, I can depend on the USMC making sure that the Marine pays it out one way or another.

  235. Bankstercide on January 23, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    I remember the scandal that erupted when people found out that cheque cashing centers were concentrated around military bases in the US.

    The reason is not so much that the servicemen and their families are poor (they are), but that servicemen’s debts are technically underwritten by the US Armed Forces.

    For example, if I get a Marine stuck in a scam where he is heavily in debt, I can depend on the USMC making sure that the Marine pays it out one way or another.

  236. Bankstercide on January 23, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    I remember the scandal that erupted when people found out that cheque cashing centers were concentrated around military bases in the US.

    The reason is not so much that the servicemen and their families are poor (they are), but that servicemen’s debts are technically underwritten by the US Armed Forces.

    For example, if I get a Marine stuck in a scam where he is heavily in debt, I can depend on the USMC making sure that the Marine pays it out one way or another.

  237. Bankstercide on January 23, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    I remember the scandal that erupted when people found out that cheque cashing centers were concentrated around military bases in the US.

    The reason is not so much that the servicemen and their families are poor (they are), but that servicemen’s debts are technically underwritten by the US Armed Forces.

    For example, if I get a Marine stuck in a scam where he is heavily in debt, I can depend on the USMC making sure that the Marine pays it out one way or another.

  238. Bankstercide on January 23, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    I remember the scandal that erupted when people found out that cheque cashing centers were concentrated around military bases in the US.

    The reason is not so much that the servicemen and their families are poor (they are), but that servicemen’s debts are technically underwritten by the US Armed Forces.

    For example, if I get a Marine stuck in a scam where he is heavily in debt, I can depend on the USMC making sure that the Marine pays it out one way or another.

  239. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    @AndrewMatt16 He’s favoring one contract over another.

  240. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    @AndrewMatt16 He’s favoring one contract over another.

  241. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    @AndrewMatt16 He’s favoring one contract over another.

  242. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    @AndrewMatt16 He’s favoring one contract over another.

  243. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    @AndrewMatt16 He’s favoring one contract over another.

  244. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    @AndrewMatt16 He’s favoring one contract over another.

  245. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    @AndrewMatt16 He’s favoring one contract over another.

  246. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    @AndrewMatt16 He’s favoring one contract over another.

  247. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    @AndrewMatt16 He’s favoring one contract over another.

  248. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    @AndrewMatt16 He’s favoring one contract over another.

  249. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    @AndrewMatt16 He’s favoring one contract over another.

  250. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    @AndrewMatt16 He’s favoring one contract over another.

  251. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    @AndrewMatt16 He’s favoring one contract over another.

  252. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 9:39 pm

    @AndrewMatt16 He’s favoring one contract over another.

  253. AndrewMatt16 on January 23, 2012 at 10:47 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo How is Dack being a hypocrite?

  254. AndrewMatt16 on January 23, 2012 at 10:47 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo How is Dack being a hypocrite?

  255. AndrewMatt16 on January 23, 2012 at 10:47 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo How is Dack being a hypocrite?

  256. AndrewMatt16 on January 23, 2012 at 10:47 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo How is Dack being a hypocrite?

  257. AndrewMatt16 on January 23, 2012 at 10:47 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo How is Dack being a hypocrite?

  258. AndrewMatt16 on January 23, 2012 at 10:47 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo How is Dack being a hypocrite?

  259. AndrewMatt16 on January 23, 2012 at 10:47 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo How is Dack being a hypocrite?

  260. AndrewMatt16 on January 23, 2012 at 10:47 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo How is Dack being a hypocrite?

  261. AndrewMatt16 on January 23, 2012 at 10:47 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo How is Dack being a hypocrite?

  262. AndrewMatt16 on January 23, 2012 at 10:47 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo How is Dack being a hypocrite?

  263. AndrewMatt16 on January 23, 2012 at 10:47 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo How is Dack being a hypocrite?

  264. AndrewMatt16 on January 23, 2012 at 10:47 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo How is Dack being a hypocrite?

  265. AndrewMatt16 on January 23, 2012 at 10:47 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo How is Dack being a hypocrite?

  266. AndrewMatt16 on January 23, 2012 at 10:47 pm

    @ooMONKEYoo How is Dack being a hypocrite?

  267. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    @DackIsBack A contract is a contract. I’m not surprised you’re a hypocrite.

  268. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    @DackIsBack A contract is a contract. I’m not surprised you’re a hypocrite.

  269. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    @DackIsBack A contract is a contract. I’m not surprised you’re a hypocrite.

  270. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    @DackIsBack A contract is a contract. I’m not surprised you’re a hypocrite.

  271. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    @DackIsBack A contract is a contract. I’m not surprised you’re a hypocrite.

  272. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    @DackIsBack A contract is a contract. I’m not surprised you’re a hypocrite.

  273. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    @DackIsBack A contract is a contract. I’m not surprised you’re a hypocrite.

  274. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    @DackIsBack A contract is a contract. I’m not surprised you’re a hypocrite.

  275. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    @DackIsBack A contract is a contract. I’m not surprised you’re a hypocrite.

  276. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    @DackIsBack A contract is a contract. I’m not surprised you’re a hypocrite.

  277. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    @DackIsBack A contract is a contract. I’m not surprised you’re a hypocrite.

  278. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    @DackIsBack A contract is a contract. I’m not surprised you’re a hypocrite.

  279. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    @DackIsBack A contract is a contract. I’m not surprised you’re a hypocrite.

  280. ooMONKEYoo on January 23, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    @DackIsBack A contract is a contract. I’m not surprised you’re a hypocrite.

  281. romanmir01 on January 24, 2012 at 1:03 am

    @Lobos222 Wait wait, so giving a loan on terms that factor in the risks of not repaying should be illegal? So it’s OK for government to stop 2 consenting parties from signing a contract?

    And again – this is clearly just a cheaper way to get a rental.

  282. romanmir01 on January 24, 2012 at 1:03 am

    @Lobos222 Wait wait, so giving a loan on terms that factor in the risks of not repaying should be illegal? So it’s OK for government to stop 2 consenting parties from signing a contract?

    And again – this is clearly just a cheaper way to get a rental.

  283. romanmir01 on January 24, 2012 at 1:03 am

    @Lobos222 Wait wait, so giving a loan on terms that factor in the risks of not repaying should be illegal? So it’s OK for government to stop 2 consenting parties from signing a contract?

    And again – this is clearly just a cheaper way to get a rental.

  284. romanmir01 on January 24, 2012 at 1:03 am

    @Lobos222 Wait wait, so giving a loan on terms that factor in the risks of not repaying should be illegal? So it’s OK for government to stop 2 consenting parties from signing a contract?

    And again – this is clearly just a cheaper way to get a rental.

  285. romanmir01 on January 24, 2012 at 1:03 am

    @Lobos222 Wait wait, so giving a loan on terms that factor in the risks of not repaying should be illegal? So it’s OK for government to stop 2 consenting parties from signing a contract?

    And again – this is clearly just a cheaper way to get a rental.

  286. romanmir01 on January 24, 2012 at 1:03 am

    @Lobos222 Wait wait, so giving a loan on terms that factor in the risks of not repaying should be illegal? So it’s OK for government to stop 2 consenting parties from signing a contract?

    And again – this is clearly just a cheaper way to get a rental.

  287. romanmir01 on January 24, 2012 at 1:03 am

    @Lobos222 Wait wait, so giving a loan on terms that factor in the risks of not repaying should be illegal? So it’s OK for government to stop 2 consenting parties from signing a contract?

    And again – this is clearly just a cheaper way to get a rental.

  288. romanmir01 on January 24, 2012 at 1:03 am

    @Lobos222 Wait wait, so giving a loan on terms that factor in the risks of not repaying should be illegal? So it’s OK for government to stop 2 consenting parties from signing a contract?

    And again – this is clearly just a cheaper way to get a rental.

  289. romanmir01 on January 24, 2012 at 1:03 am

    @Lobos222 Wait wait, so giving a loan on terms that factor in the risks of not repaying should be illegal? So it’s OK for government to stop 2 consenting parties from signing a contract?

    And again – this is clearly just a cheaper way to get a rental.

  290. romanmir01 on January 24, 2012 at 1:03 am

    @Lobos222 Wait wait, so giving a loan on terms that factor in the risks of not repaying should be illegal? So it’s OK for government to stop 2 consenting parties from signing a contract?

    And again – this is clearly just a cheaper way to get a rental.

  291. romanmir01 on January 24, 2012 at 1:03 am

    @Lobos222 Wait wait, so giving a loan on terms that factor in the risks of not repaying should be illegal? So it’s OK for government to stop 2 consenting parties from signing a contract?

    And again – this is clearly just a cheaper way to get a rental.

  292. romanmir01 on January 24, 2012 at 1:03 am

    @Lobos222 Wait wait, so giving a loan on terms that factor in the risks of not repaying should be illegal? So it’s OK for government to stop 2 consenting parties from signing a contract?

    And again – this is clearly just a cheaper way to get a rental.

  293. romanmir01 on January 24, 2012 at 1:03 am

    @Lobos222 Wait wait, so giving a loan on terms that factor in the risks of not repaying should be illegal? So it’s OK for government to stop 2 consenting parties from signing a contract?

    And again – this is clearly just a cheaper way to get a rental.

  294. romanmir01 on January 24, 2012 at 1:03 am

    @Lobos222 Wait wait, so giving a loan on terms that factor in the risks of not repaying should be illegal? So it’s OK for government to stop 2 consenting parties from signing a contract?

    And again – this is clearly just a cheaper way to get a rental.

  295. Lobos222 on January 24, 2012 at 2:11 am

    @romanmir01
    Scamming people shouldnt be legal.
    How hard is that to get. If you think scamming people is okay then I clearly dont agree with you.

    There is no benefit if you, for example, is given a loan by anyone the loaner KNOWS beforehand you cant afford. Thats the part that is the scam.

    If it was illegal you would win in court and they wouldnt do it from the get go and that would benefit the general public when they where told they could get a loan they could afford because it would be true.

  296. Lobos222 on January 24, 2012 at 2:11 am

    @romanmir01
    Scamming people shouldnt be legal.
    How hard is that to get. If you think scamming people is okay then I clearly dont agree with you.

    There is no benefit if you, for example, is given a loan by anyone the loaner KNOWS beforehand you cant afford. Thats the part that is the scam.

    If it was illegal you would win in court and they wouldnt do it from the get go and that would benefit the general public when they where told they could get a loan they could afford because it would be true.

  297. Lobos222 on January 24, 2012 at 2:11 am

    @romanmir01
    Scamming people shouldnt be legal.
    How hard is that to get. If you think scamming people is okay then I clearly dont agree with you.

    There is no benefit if you, for example, is given a loan by anyone the loaner KNOWS beforehand you cant afford. Thats the part that is the scam.

    If it was illegal you would win in court and they wouldnt do it from the get go and that would benefit the general public when they where told they could get a loan they could afford because it would be true.

  298. Lobos222 on January 24, 2012 at 2:11 am

    @romanmir01
    Scamming people shouldnt be legal.
    How hard is that to get. If you think scamming people is okay then I clearly dont agree with you.

    There is no benefit if you, for example, is given a loan by anyone the loaner KNOWS beforehand you cant afford. Thats the part that is the scam.

    If it was illegal you would win in court and they wouldnt do it from the get go and that would benefit the general public when they where told they could get a loan they could afford because it would be true.

  299. Lobos222 on January 24, 2012 at 2:11 am

    @romanmir01
    Scamming people shouldnt be legal.
    How hard is that to get. If you think scamming people is okay then I clearly dont agree with you.

    There is no benefit if you, for example, is given a loan by anyone the loaner KNOWS beforehand you cant afford. Thats the part that is the scam.

    If it was illegal you would win in court and they wouldnt do it from the get go and that would benefit the general public when they where told they could get a loan they could afford because it would be true.

  300. Lobos222 on January 24, 2012 at 2:11 am

    @romanmir01
    Scamming people shouldnt be legal.
    How hard is that to get. If you think scamming people is okay then I clearly dont agree with you.

    There is no benefit if you, for example, is given a loan by anyone the loaner KNOWS beforehand you cant afford. Thats the part that is the scam.

    If it was illegal you would win in court and they wouldnt do it from the get go and that would benefit the general public when they where told they could get a loan they could afford because it would be true.

  301. Lobos222 on January 24, 2012 at 2:11 am

    @romanmir01
    Scamming people shouldnt be legal.
    How hard is that to get. If you think scamming people is okay then I clearly dont agree with you.

    There is no benefit if you, for example, is given a loan by anyone the loaner KNOWS beforehand you cant afford. Thats the part that is the scam.

    If it was illegal you would win in court and they wouldnt do it from the get go and that would benefit the general public when they where told they could get a loan they could afford because it would be true.

  302. Lobos222 on January 24, 2012 at 2:11 am

    @romanmir01
    Scamming people shouldnt be legal.
    How hard is that to get. If you think scamming people is okay then I clearly dont agree with you.

    There is no benefit if you, for example, is given a loan by anyone the loaner KNOWS beforehand you cant afford. Thats the part that is the scam.

    If it was illegal you would win in court and they wouldnt do it from the get go and that would benefit the general public when they where told they could get a loan they could afford because it would be true.

  303. Lobos222 on January 24, 2012 at 2:11 am

    @romanmir01
    Scamming people shouldnt be legal.
    How hard is that to get. If you think scamming people is okay then I clearly dont agree with you.

    There is no benefit if you, for example, is given a loan by anyone the loaner KNOWS beforehand you cant afford. Thats the part that is the scam.

    If it was illegal you would win in court and they wouldnt do it from the get go and that would benefit the general public when they where told they could get a loan they could afford because it would be true.

  304. Lobos222 on January 24, 2012 at 2:11 am

    @romanmir01
    Scamming people shouldnt be legal.
    How hard is that to get. If you think scamming people is okay then I clearly dont agree with you.

    There is no benefit if you, for example, is given a loan by anyone the loaner KNOWS beforehand you cant afford. Thats the part that is the scam.

    If it was illegal you would win in court and they wouldnt do it from the get go and that would benefit the general public when they where told they could get a loan they could afford because it would be true.

  305. Lobos222 on January 24, 2012 at 2:11 am

    @romanmir01
    Scamming people shouldnt be legal.
    How hard is that to get. If you think scamming people is okay then I clearly dont agree with you.

    There is no benefit if you, for example, is given a loan by anyone the loaner KNOWS beforehand you cant afford. Thats the part that is the scam.

    If it was illegal you would win in court and they wouldnt do it from the get go and that would benefit the general public when they where told they could get a loan they could afford because it would be true.

  306. Lobos222 on January 24, 2012 at 2:11 am

    @romanmir01
    Scamming people shouldnt be legal.
    How hard is that to get. If you think scamming people is okay then I clearly dont agree with you.

    There is no benefit if you, for example, is given a loan by anyone the loaner KNOWS beforehand you cant afford. Thats the part that is the scam.

    If it was illegal you would win in court and they wouldnt do it from the get go and that would benefit the general public when they where told they could get a loan they could afford because it would be true.

  307. Lobos222 on January 24, 2012 at 2:11 am

    @romanmir01
    Scamming people shouldnt be legal.
    How hard is that to get. If you think scamming people is okay then I clearly dont agree with you.

    There is no benefit if you, for example, is given a loan by anyone the loaner KNOWS beforehand you cant afford. Thats the part that is the scam.

    If it was illegal you would win in court and they wouldnt do it from the get go and that would benefit the general public when they where told they could get a loan they could afford because it would be true.

  308. Lobos222 on January 24, 2012 at 2:11 am

    @romanmir01
    Scamming people shouldnt be legal.
    How hard is that to get. If you think scamming people is okay then I clearly dont agree with you.

    There is no benefit if you, for example, is given a loan by anyone the loaner KNOWS beforehand you cant afford. Thats the part that is the scam.

    If it was illegal you would win in court and they wouldnt do it from the get go and that would benefit the general public when they where told they could get a loan they could afford because it would be true.

  309. Blake00010001 on January 24, 2012 at 3:19 am

    Go to drivetime .. They’ll screw you good

  310. Blake00010001 on January 24, 2012 at 3:19 am

    Go to drivetime .. They’ll screw you good

  311. Blake00010001 on January 24, 2012 at 3:19 am

    Go to drivetime .. They’ll screw you good

  312. Blake00010001 on January 24, 2012 at 3:19 am

    Go to drivetime .. They’ll screw you good

  313. Blake00010001 on January 24, 2012 at 3:19 am

    Go to drivetime .. They’ll screw you good

  314. Blake00010001 on January 24, 2012 at 3:19 am

    Go to drivetime .. They’ll screw you good

  315. Blake00010001 on January 24, 2012 at 3:19 am

    Go to drivetime .. They’ll screw you good

  316. Blake00010001 on January 24, 2012 at 3:19 am

    Go to drivetime .. They’ll screw you good

  317. Blake00010001 on January 24, 2012 at 3:19 am

    Go to drivetime .. They’ll screw you good

  318. Blake00010001 on January 24, 2012 at 3:19 am

    Go to drivetime .. They’ll screw you good

  319. Blake00010001 on January 24, 2012 at 3:19 am

    Go to drivetime .. They’ll screw you good

  320. Blake00010001 on January 24, 2012 at 3:19 am

    Go to drivetime .. They’ll screw you good

  321. Blake00010001 on January 24, 2012 at 3:19 am

    Go to drivetime .. They’ll screw you good

  322. Blake00010001 on January 24, 2012 at 3:19 am

    Go to drivetime .. They’ll screw you good

  323. Fireonmyhand on January 24, 2012 at 4:27 am

    @MastermindX You vote for the people who will give you free and reliable public transportation and wont spent the money where its not needed

  324. Fireonmyhand on January 24, 2012 at 4:27 am

    @MastermindX You vote for the people who will give you free and reliable public transportation and wont spent the money where its not needed

  325. Fireonmyhand on January 24, 2012 at 4:27 am

    @MastermindX You vote for the people who will give you free and reliable public transportation and wont spent the money where its not needed

  326. Fireonmyhand on January 24, 2012 at 4:27 am

    @MastermindX You vote for the people who will give you free and reliable public transportation and wont spent the money where its not needed

  327. Fireonmyhand on January 24, 2012 at 4:27 am

    @MastermindX You vote for the people who will give you free and reliable public transportation and wont spent the money where its not needed

  328. Fireonmyhand on January 24, 2012 at 4:27 am

    @MastermindX You vote for the people who will give you free and reliable public transportation and wont spent the money where its not needed

  329. Fireonmyhand on January 24, 2012 at 4:27 am

    @MastermindX You vote for the people who will give you free and reliable public transportation and wont spent the money where its not needed

  330. Fireonmyhand on January 24, 2012 at 4:27 am

    @MastermindX You vote for the people who will give you free and reliable public transportation and wont spent the money where its not needed

  331. Fireonmyhand on January 24, 2012 at 4:27 am

    @MastermindX You vote for the people who will give you free and reliable public transportation and wont spent the money where its not needed

  332. Fireonmyhand on January 24, 2012 at 4:27 am

    @MastermindX You vote for the people who will give you free and reliable public transportation and wont spent the money where its not needed

  333. Fireonmyhand on January 24, 2012 at 4:27 am

    @MastermindX You vote for the people who will give you free and reliable public transportation and wont spent the money where its not needed

  334. Fireonmyhand on January 24, 2012 at 4:27 am

    @MastermindX You vote for the people who will give you free and reliable public transportation and wont spent the money where its not needed

  335. Fireonmyhand on January 24, 2012 at 4:27 am

    @MastermindX You vote for the people who will give you free and reliable public transportation and wont spent the money where its not needed

  336. Fireonmyhand on January 24, 2012 at 4:27 am

    @MastermindX You vote for the people who will give you free and reliable public transportation and wont spent the money where its not needed

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*